The Comments: Part 3 of many

These posts are the comments made by outsiders who read the article in the paper.

STEVEUT Wrote:

“Although I don’t agree with assaulting anybody in any way. Something tells me there is more to this story than what we’ve been told in this article. I’ve known people in messy custody battles. What happens if she is being railroaded by the courts and she knows of abuse taking place on her children? What happens if what she did was her motherly instinct taking over and she was trying to protect them in some way. True her actions would hurt more than help the situation. But I can’t see too many other reasons why a woman would do what she did right in front of the police station unless she truly felt justified. I’m not too sure I feel comfortable assuming meth and zanax were the culprits on this one.”

I happen to agree with this very much so. I have seen my share of custody battles, some very messy as this one seems to be. In these certain cases there is always more to it than what meets the eye, or in this case what is reported to the public. Yes, Ms Callaway was not legally justified in her actions, as nobody would be in any similar situation, however, events like this leave me wondering what is really going on. I have seen custody battles turn this bitter only in the case where abuse is involved, And the man that is the source of the abuse is the one with all of the control. So I am led to believe that Ms Callaway is fighting for her child in more ways than one. If you fully research this situation you will find the Mr. Callaway is not a model citizen either, He himself has graced the front page of the Daily Herald some years ago. I do not feel that anyone is justified in passing judgment in this case, as if you just do a little research into the matter you will find there is much more going on beyond the custody battle.

~ by poeticprincess1014 on September 26, 2008.